(no title)

Poll #1263070… - Nate Bunnyfield — LiveJournal

Nate Bunnyfield

[	userinfo	\|	livejournal userinfo	]
[	archive	\|	journal archive	]

Links

[

Links:

natehaas.com onetake (my experimental music podcast)

]

	[Sep. 19th, 2008\|01:57 pm] Nate Bunnyfield
Poll #1263070 Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All. Participants: 20 How literally-minded are you? View Answers Mean: 7.30 Median: 7.5 Std. Dev 1.90 1 0(0.0%) 2 0(0.0%) 3 0(0.0%) 4 1(5.0%) 5 4(20.0%) 6 3(15.0%) 7 2(10.0%) 8 3(15.0%) 9 4(20.0%) 10 3(15.0%) How awesome are you? View Answers Mean: 8.37 Median: 9 Std. Dev 2.03 1 0(0.0%) 2 0(0.0%) 3 0(0.0%) 4 2(10.5%) 5 1(5.3%) 6 0(0.0%) 7 2(10.5%) 8 3(15.8%) 9 2(10.5%) 10 9(47.4%) _{a pilot study for http://voidptr.livejournal.com/191848.html?thread=249960#t249960}
Link	Reply

Comments:

From:

lazyman
2008-09-21 10:06 am (UTC)

You've eliminated the blindness of the study with the link at the bottom. You could just mine data from past entries.

(Reply) (Thread)

From:

lazyman
2008-09-21 10:58 am (UTC)

Estimating "audience engagement" from the number of comments, I went through and ranked your January entries in a few categories. The standouts were all personal anecdotes / introspection, except for the one "link" entry with the Burger King receipt. Surprisingly to me, the presence of a photo with an entry didn't appear to give it a boost -- although the sample size was really too small to draw conclusions. Also, I just realized I should total the number of commenters in addition to the total number of comments. Posts that spawn long back-and-forth conversations are probably different than those that have lots of single responses.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

From:

voidptr
2008-09-21 02:58 pm (UTC)

Come up with a spreadsheet for me, and I'll paint it.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

From:

voidptr
2008-09-21 03:00 pm (UTC)

Oh, and I would definitely say that your "literal-minded" 10 has a low margin of error.

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)

Log in