?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Really great follow-up on having tits and such in a publicly shared… - Nate Bunnyfield [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Nate Bunnyfield

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| natehaas.com onetake (my experimental music podcast) ]

[Dec. 5th, 2007|01:25 pm]
Nate Bunnyfield
Really great follow-up on having tits and such in a publicly shared inspirational folder / scrap file...



then http://centripetalnotion.com/2007/12/03/10:03:08

Personally, I think this kind of categorization is a crutch.
Porn/erotica/nekkidity is legitimate art.

And there is always something wrong with prescriptively antisexual people.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: grey_hash
2007-12-07 10:30 pm (UTC)
Yeah - I imagine it was a woman who wrote this too.

Not that I completely disagree. Over-saturation of the "sex sells" mentality just dulls our sensitivity to it (and can get disgusting quickly).
Sensationalism will always sell. Love and war are two or our base instincts and sensationalism capitalizes on these instincts. Graphic design is often designed to "sell" and so graphic design which contains references to love/sex or violence/death will always sell. Get over it. A beautiful woman will always be used to sell beer . . . but as my dad used to say: "Does the girl come with it?"
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)